MG13 - Talk detail

Back to previous page

 Participant

Institution

Session

Accepted

Yes

Order

Time

Talk

Title

Abstract

Einstein’s Sep. 1905 paper in which ∆L=∆mc2 (light energy –mass equation) is derived, is not completely studied; and is only valid under special conditions of involved parameters. ∆E=∆mc2 is obtained from ∆L=∆mc2 by simply replacing L by E (every energy) without derivation. Here results are critically analysed taking all possible variables in account. Under some conditions of valid parameters ∆L=∆mc2 is not obtained e.g. sometimes result is Ma =Mb or no equation is derivable. If all values of all valid parameters are taken in account then the same derivation also gives L ∆mc2 or L =A ∆mc2, where A is coefficient of proportionality. Thus Einstein’s derivation under the valid parameters also predicts that energy emitted may be less or more than ∆E=∆mc2. It may be confirmed in chemical phenomena ( the utmost sensitive and specific equipments), in bizarre cosmological and astrophysical phenomena( Solar flares , supernova etc). This theoretical and experimental analysis is significant in view of initial findings of neutrinos travelling faster than light in MINOS and OPERA experiments which support that speed neutrinos exceed the speed of light, c.

Session

Accepted

No

Order

Time

Talk

Title

Abstract

The qualitative idea of mass energy inter-conversion may have existed before Einstein but quantitatively established it in Sep. 1905 paper. In this paper Einstein derived ∆L=∆mc2 (light energy –mass equation), it is not completely studied; and is only valid under special conditions of involved parameters. ∆E=∆mc2 is obtained from ∆L=∆mc2 by simply replacing L by E (every energy) without derivation. Here results are critically analysed taking all possible variables in account. Under some conditions of valid parameters ∆L=∆mc2 is not obtained e.g. sometimes result is Ma =Mb or no equation is derivable. If all values of all valid parameters are taken in account then the same derivation also gives L α ∆mc2 or L =A ∆mc2, where A is coefficient of proportionality. Thus Einstein’s derivation under the valid parameters also predicts that energy emitted may be less or more than ∆E=∆mc2. It may be confirmed in chemical phenomena ( the utmost sensitive and specific equipments), in bizarre cosmological and astrophysical phenomena( Solar flares , supernova etc). This theoretical and experimental analysis is significant in view of initial findings of neutrinos travelling faster than light in MINOS and OPERA experiments which support that speed neutrinos exceed the speed of light, c.

Session

Accepted

No

Order

Time

Talk

Title

Abstract

Einstein‘s Sep. 1905 paper in which ∆L=∆m c^2 (light energy –mass equation) is derived, is not completely studied; and is only valid under special conditions of involved parameters. Sometimes the derivation becomes invalid and ∆L=∆mc^2 is not always obtained. The origin of ∆E=∆m c^2 from ∆L=∆mc^2 is completely speculative in nature without mathematical derivation. ∆E=∆mc^2 is obtained from ∆L=∆mc^2 by simply replacing L by E. ∆L=∆mc^2 was initially derived for light energy –mass inter-conversion, then it was generalized for every energy ∆E=∆m c^2. It is not justified logically and mathematically. The factor c^2 has been arbitrarily brought in picture by Einstein. As to obtain L =∆mc^2 Einstein retained term v^2/2 c^2 (compared to unity) without giving numerical values to v . If the value of v is considered in typical classical region, 1cm/s say (v^2/2c^2 =5.55×10^-22 is negligible) then result is Mb =Ma. Thus conversion factor c2 is arbitrarily brought in the picture as both the results i.e. ∆L=∆m c^2 and Mb =Ma are equally probable. Further, if body emits light energy, but measuring system is at rest (v=0) even then Einstein’s derivation is not applicable or valid and no result is obtained. If all values of parameters are taken in account then the same derivation also gives L ‘proportional to’ ∆mc^2 or L =A∆mc^2, where A is coefficient of proportionality. Thus the value of energy emitted varies with variables, thus result is not always ∆L=∆mc^2. There are numerous values of coefficients of proportionality in the existing physics. The energy emitted can be less or more than emitted by L/c2. Thus Einstein’s derivation of ∆L=∆mc^2 and speculation of ∆E=∆mc^2 is not mathematically and logically consistent. This theoretical and experimental analysis is significant in view of initial findings of neutrinos travelling faster than light in MINOS and OPERA experiments. The repeatability of experiments is being tested at Fermi Lab in NOVA experiments.

Session

Accepted

No

Order

Time

Talk

Title

Abstract

Einstein‘s Sep. 1905 paper in which L=mc^2 (light energy –mass equation) is derived, is not completely studied; and is only valid under special conditions of involved parameters. Sometimes the derivation becomes invalid and L=mc^2 is not always obtained. The origin of ∆E=mc^2 from L=∆mc^2 is completely speculative in nature without mathematical derivation. ∆E=mc^2 is obtained from L=mc^2 by simply replacing L by E. L=mc^2 was initially derived for light energy –mass inter-conversion, then it was generalized for every energy ∆E=∆m c^2. It is not justified logically and mathematically. The factor c^2 has been arbitrarily brought in picture by Einstein. As to obtain L=mc^2 Einstein retained term v^2/2 c^2 (compared to unity) without giving numerical values to v . If the value of v is considered in typical classical region, 1cm/s say (v^2/2c^2 =5.55×10^-22 is negligible) then result is Mb =Ma. Thus conversion factor c2 is arbitrarily brought in the picture as both the results i.e. L=m c^2 and Mb =Ma are equally probable. Further, if body emits light energy, but measuring system is at rest (v=0) even then Einstein’s derivation is not applicable or valid and no result is obtained. If all values of parameters are taken in account then the same derivation also gives L ‘proportional to’ mc^2 or =Amc^2, where A is coefficient of proportionality. Thus the value of energy emitted varies with variables, thus result is not always ∆L=∆mc^2. There are numerous values of coefficients of proportionality in the existing physics. The energy emitted can be less or more than emitted by L/c2. Thus Einstein’s derivation of L=mc^2 and speculation of E=mc^2 is not mathematically and logically consistent. This theoretical and experimental analysis is significant in view of initial findings of neutrinos travelling faster than light in MINOS and OPERA experiments. The repeatability of experiments is being tested at Fermi Lab in NOVA experiments.

Session

Accepted

Order

Time

Talk

Title

Abstract

Einstein‘s Sep. 1905 paper in which L=mc^2 (light energy –mass equation) is derived, is not completely studied; and is only valid under special conditions of involved parameters. Sometimes the derivation becomes invalid and L=mc^2 is not always obtained. The origin of ∆E=mc^2 from L=∆mc^2 is completely speculative in nature without mathematical derivation. ∆E=mc^2 is obtained from L=mc^2 by simply replacing L by E. L=mc^2 was initially derived for light energy –mass inter-conversion, then it was generalized for every energy ∆E=∆m c^2. It is not justified logically and mathematically. The factor c^2 has been arbitrarily brought in picture by Einstein. As to obtain L=mc^2 Einstein retained term v^2/2 c^2 (compared to unity) without giving numerical values to v . If the value of v is considered in typical classical region, 1cm/s say (v^2/2c^2 =5.55×10^-22 is negligible) then result is Mb =Ma. Thus conversion factor c2 is arbitrarily brought in the picture as both the results i.e. L=m c^2 and Mb =Ma are equally probable. Further, if body emits light energy, but measuring system is at rest (v=0) even then Einstein’s derivation is not applicable or valid and no result is obtained. If all values of parameters are taken in account then the same derivation also gives L ‘proportional to’ mc^2 or =Amc^2, where A is coefficient of proportionality. Thus the value of energy emitted varies with variables, thus result is not always ∆L=∆mc^2. There are numerous values of coefficients of proportionality in the existing physics. The energy emitted can be less or more than emitted by L/c2. Thus Einstein’s derivation of L=mc^2 and speculation of E=mc^2 is not mathematically and logically consistent. This theoretical and experimental analysis is significant in view of initial findings of neutrinos travelling faster than light in MINOS and OPERA experiments. The repeatability of experiments is being tested at Fermi Lab in NOVA experiments.

Back to previous page